Apparently some former Google folk decided they could do search better. Enter Cuil, which is becoming a synonym for fail.
UPDATE(S):
- Cuil does a number on Patrick’s iFroggy Network.
- Someone, erm, sidestepped the Wikipedia neutrality guidelines in the Cuil article.
- I’m quoted in Veronica Belmont’s analysis of Cuil.
- The Girl Riot also points to my LinkedIn fail as an example of Cuil fail.
- To be fair, things are improving a little bit, as I’m getting some more reliable results now. The “About Cuil” page no longer 404s, too. It still has a ways to go, and a lot of work to do both technically and in PR to overcome this absolutely terrible first impression.
Also, if you find this story worthy, please give it an ol’ Digg. 
Discussion of Thoughts on Cuil, In Pictures is now closed
maybe that’s the guy who cloned your twitter feed?
[...] to that great of a start. Especially when it comes to pictures being associated with the content.read more | digg [...]
[...] to Jared for pointing me in the right direction. Is this worth [...]
That’s too funny! Agreed. While I do show up in Cuil (18,000 times it says - I mean I know I’m important, but I really don’t think I show up 18,000 times), everything that comes up is like ancient history. A lot of it from a job I worked like 6-8 years ago. Hope no one goes there looking for me.